GeForce RTX 5070 GB203 vs Xclipse 960 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMGFX4 (2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameJunoGB203
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)31 August 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed985 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2512 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45.6 billion
Manufacturing process technology2 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate63.04482.3
ROPs6480
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores1648
L0 Cache256 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB6 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.9
OpenGLES 3.24.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 March 2026 31 August 2026
Chip lithography 2 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Xclipse 960 GPU has a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 GB203, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between Xclipse 960 GPU and GeForce RTX 5070 GB203. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xclipse 960 GPU is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 GB203 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 960 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 GB203 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xclipse 960 GPU or GeForce RTX 5070 GB203, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.