Xclipse 960 GPU vs GeForce RTX 5090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2not rated
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.89no data
Power efficiency12.60no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)MGFX4 (2026)
GPU code nameGB202Juno
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 January 2025 (1 year ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores217601024
Core clock speed2017 MHz985 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHzno data
Number of transistors92,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm2 nm
Power consumption (TDP)575 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1,636.863.04
Floating-point processing power104.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs17664
TMUs68064
Tensor Cores680no data
Ray Tracing Cores17016
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache21.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache96 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16IGP
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1bPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.2
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 January 2025 11 March 2026
Chip lithography 5 nm 2 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 575 Watt 15 Watt

Xclipse 960 GPU has an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 3733% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 5090 and Xclipse 960 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop graphics card while Xclipse 960 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 4315 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 960 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5090 or Xclipse 960 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.