Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs UHD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics P630 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU outperforms Graphics P630 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 653 | 643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 30.53 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Xe3 (2026) |
| GPU code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Wildcat Lake |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 May 2018 (8 years ago) | 1 May 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4608 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 3 | no data |
| TMUs | 24 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21−24
−4.8%
| 22
+4.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−3.4%
|
30−33
+3.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−3.4%
|
30−33
+3.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−2.8%
|
35−40
+2.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−1.5%
|
65−70
+1.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−3.4%
|
30−33
+3.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
−3%
|
100−110
+3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−2.8%
|
35−40
+2.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+10.5%
|
19
−10.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−1.5%
|
65−70
+1.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−2.9%
|
70−75
+2.9%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
−2.8%
|
35−40
+2.8%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−2.2%
|
45−50
+2.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+8.6%
|
35−40
−8.6%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−3.3%
|
60−65
+3.3%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Palworld | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is 5% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 11% faster.
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is 25% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics P630 performs better in 1 test (2%)
- Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU performs better in 29 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.92 | 6.10 |
| Recency | 24 May 2018 | 1 May 2026 |
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics P630 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
