Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs UHD Graphics 750
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 750 outperforms Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 743 | 831 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.48 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | no data |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Wildcat Lake |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 May 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6656 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21−24
+23.5%
| 17
−23.5%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+19.1%
|
45−50
−19.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+32.1%
|
55−60
−32.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+30%
|
10
−30%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+19.1%
|
45−50
−19.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+45.5%
|
21−24
−45.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+50%
|
27−30
−50%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is 24% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics 750 surpassed Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU in all 47 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.16 | 2.95 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 1 May 2026 |
UHD Graphics 750 has a 41% higher aggregate performance score.
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years.
The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
