GeForce RTX 5050 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal and GeForce RTX 5050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Titan X Pascal
2016, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
31.07

RTX 5050 outperforms Titan X Pascal by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking208125
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0095.33
Power efficiency9.6923.91
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGP102GB207
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)1 July 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 5050 has 1489% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1417 MHz2317 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz2572 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million16,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9205.8
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9632
TMUs22480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1.3 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MB24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.07
RTX 5050 39.87
+28.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
RTX 5050 16713
+28.3%
Samples: 3177

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124150−160
+21%
1440p7490−95
+21.6%
4K5870−75
+20.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.671.66
+82.8%
1440p16.202.77
+82.9%
4K20.673.56
+82.8%
  • RTX 5050 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5050 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5050 has 83% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 337 400−450
+18.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 83 100−105
+20.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 119 150−160
+26.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 126 160−170
+27%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 153 190−200
+24.2%
Counter-Strike 2 291 350−400
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 74 90−95
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 162 200−210
+23.5%
Fortnite 210 260−270
+23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 127 160−170
+26%
Hogwarts Legacy 90 110−120
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 140−150
+23.9%
Valorant 296 350−400
+18.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 147 180−190
+22.4%
Counter-Strike 2 205 260−270
+26.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 350−400
+26.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65 80−85
+23.1%
Dota 2 252 300−310
+19%
Far Cry 5 149 190−200
+27.5%
Fortnite 199 250−260
+25.6%
Forza Horizon 4 121 150−160
+24%
Grand Theft Auto V 160 200−210
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 72 90−95
+25%
Metro Exodus 96 120−130
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 140−150
+23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184 230−240
+25%
Valorant 275 350−400
+27.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137 170−180
+24.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 57 70−75
+22.8%
Dota 2 232 290−300
+25%
Far Cry 5 140 170−180
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 112 140−150
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 55 70−75
+27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102 130−140
+27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 120−130
+26.3%
Valorant 181 230−240
+27.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170 210−220
+23.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111 140−150
+26.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 280−290
+26.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 103 130−140
+26.2%
Metro Exodus 58 70−75
+20.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 220−230
+25.7%
Valorant 258 300−310
+16.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 100−105
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 37 45−50
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 101 120−130
+18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 110−120
+27.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 41 50−55
+22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 70−75
+25%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 100−105
+23.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 99 120−130
+21.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 24−27
+20%
Metro Exodus 36 45−50
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68 85−90
+25%
Valorant 257 300−310
+16.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71 90−95
+26.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 17 21−24
+23.5%
Dota 2 160 200−210
+25%
Far Cry 5 53 65−70
+22.6%
Forza Horizon 4 73 90−95
+23.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 22 27−30
+22.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 55−60
+25%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60 75−80
+25%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX 5050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5050 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5050 is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.07 39.87
Recency 2 August 2016 1 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 130 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5050, on the other hand, has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 69% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3019 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2341 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce RTX 5050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.