Arc B570 vs Titan X Pascal

Place in the ranking	208	176
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.00	84.78
Power efficiency	9.69	17.55
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code name	GP102	BMG-G21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 August 2016 (10 years ago)	16 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc B570 has 1313% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2304
Core clock speed	1417 MHz	2500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	360.0
Floating-point processing power	10.97 TFLOPS	11.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	80
TMUs	224	144
Tensor Cores	no data	144
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	18
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	4.5 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	9 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	272 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1251 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	380.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.4
CUDA	+	-
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.07

Arc B570 33.76
+8.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026

Arc B570 14153
+8.7%

Samples: 559

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124	130−140 +4.8%
1440p	74	80−85 +8.1%
4K	58	60−65 +3.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.67	1.68 +82.6%
1440p	16.20	2.74 +83.1%
4K	20.67	3.65 +82.3%

Arc B570 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc B570 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc B570 has 82% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	337	350−400 +3.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	83	90−95 +8.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	119	120−130 +0.8%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	126	130−140 +3.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	153	160−170 +4.6%
Counter-Strike 2	291	300−310 +3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	74	80−85 +8.1%
Far Cry 5	162	170−180 +4.9%
Fortnite	210	220−230 +4.8%
Forza Horizon 4	127	130−140 +2.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	90	95−100 +5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	113	120−130 +6.2%
Valorant	296	300−310 +1.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	147	150−160 +2%
Counter-Strike 2	205	220−230 +7.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	290−300 +5.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65	70−75 +7.7%
Dota 2	252	270−280 +7.1%
Far Cry 5	149	160−170 +7.4%
Fortnite	199	210−220 +5.5%
Forza Horizon 4	121	130−140 +7.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	160	170−180 +6.3%
Hogwarts Legacy	72	75−80 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	96	100−105 +4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	113	120−130 +6.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184	190−200 +3.3%
Valorant	275	290−300 +5.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	137	140−150 +2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	57	60−65 +5.3%
Dota 2	232	250−260 +7.8%
Far Cry 5	140	150−160 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	112	120−130 +7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy	55	55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	102	110−120 +7.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95	100−105 +5.3%
Valorant	181	190−200 +5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

170

180−190
+5.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	111	120−130 +8.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230	240−250 +8.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	103	110−120 +6.8%
Metro Exodus	58	60−65 +3.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	190−200 +8.6%
Valorant	258	280−290 +8.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	85−90	90−95 +5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	37	40−45 +8.1%
Far Cry 5	101 +1%	100−105
Forza Horizon 4	85−90	90−95 +4.7%
Hogwarts Legacy	41 +2.5%	40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	60−65 +7.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

80−85

85−90
+4.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40	35−40
Grand Theft Auto V	99	100−105 +1%
Hogwarts Legacy	20−22	21−24 +5%
Metro Exodus	36 +2.9%	35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68	70−75 +2.9%
Valorant	257	270−280 +5.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	71	75−80 +5.6%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	17	18−20 +5.9%
Dota 2	160	170−180 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	53	55−60 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	73	75−80 +2.7%
Hogwarts Legacy	22 +4.8%	21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	44	45−50 +2.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

65−70
+8.3%

This is how Titan X Pascal and Arc B570 compete in popular games:

Arc B570 is 5% faster in 1080p
Arc B570 is 8% faster in 1440p
Arc B570 is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.07	33.76
Recency	2 August 2016	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc B570, on the other hand, has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 69% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Titan X Pascal and Arc B570.