Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Tesla K80
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla K80 with Radeon RX Vega 11, including specs and performance data.
K80 outperforms RX Vega 11 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 421 | 693 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 98 |
| Power efficiency | 3.57 | 15.55 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GK210 | Raven |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 November 2014 (11 years ago) | 12 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2496 ×2 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1240 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,100 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 171.4 ×2 | 54.56 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 8 |
| TMUs | 208 ×2 | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s ×2 | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 3.7 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 75−80
+168%
| 28 |
| 1440p | 16−18 | 6
−62.5%
|
| 4K | 30−35
+150%
| 12 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| Battlefield 5 | 31 | 31 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Far Cry 5 | 19 | 19 |
| Fortnite | 86 | 86 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 38 | 38 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Valorant | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| Battlefield 5 | 26 | 26 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Dota 2 | 46 | 46 |
| Far Cry 5 | 18 | 18 |
| Fortnite | 31 | 31 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35 | 35 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 17 | 17 |
| Metro Exodus | 9 | 9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14 | 14 |
| Valorant | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 25 | 25 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Dota 2 | 42 | 42 |
| Far Cry 5 | 17 | 17 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 29 | 29 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10 | 10 |
| Valorant | 60−65 | 60−65 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−33 | 30−33 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Valorant | 50−55 | 50−55 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8 | 7−8 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Valorant | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 17 | 17 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12 | 12 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6 | 5−6 |
This is how Tesla K80 and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:
- Tesla K80 is 168% faster in 1080p
- Tesla K80 is 167% faster in 1440p
- Tesla K80 is 150% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.75 | 4.99 |
| Recency | 17 November 2014 | 12 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 25 Watt |
Tesla K80 has a 176% higher aggregate performance score.
RX Vega 11, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.
The Tesla K80 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
