Radeon 8065S vs TITAN Xp

Place in the ranking	86	85
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.75	no data
Power efficiency	14.46	65.83
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)
GPU code name	GP102	Gorgon Halo
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	6 April 2017 (9 years ago)	28 September 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2560
Core clock speed	1405 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	379.7	480.0
Floating-point processing power	12.15 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	240	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40
L0 Cache	no data	1.3 MB
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	1 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1426 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	547.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN Xp 46.43

Radeon 8065S 46.51
+0.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424

Radeon 8065S 19456
+0.2%

Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	140−150	140−150
Counter-Strike 2	250−260	250−260
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120	110−120
Resident Evil 4 Remake	130−140	130−140

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	140−150	140−150
Battlefield 5	140−150	140−150
Counter-Strike 2	250−260	250−260
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120	110−120
Far Cry 5	140−150	140−150
Fortnite	200−210	200−210
Forza Horizon 4	180−190	180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	270−280	270−280

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	140−150	140−150
Battlefield 5	140−150	140−150
Counter-Strike 2	250−260	250−260
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	270−280
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120	110−120
Far Cry 5	140−150	140−150
Fortnite	200−210	200−210
Forza Horizon 4	180−190	180−190
Grand Theft Auto V	140−150	140−150
Metro Exodus	110−120	110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190	180−190
Valorant	270−280	270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	140−150	140−150
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120	110−120
Far Cry 5	140−150	140−150
Forza Horizon 4	180−190	180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190	180−190

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	120−130	120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	300−350	300−350
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110	100−110
Metro Exodus	70−75	70−75
Valorant	300−350	300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60	55−60
Far Cry 5	110−120	110−120
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100	95−100

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

120−130

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	55−60	55−60
Grand Theft Auto V	110−120	110−120
Metro Exodus	45−50	45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85	80−85
Valorant	280−290	280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80	75−80
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	27−30
Far Cry 5	65−70	65−70
Forza Horizon 4	95−100	95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75	70−75