Radeon RX 5700 XT vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX 5700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
40.93
+6.8%

TITAN V outperforms 5700 XT by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114138
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1432.23
Power efficiency12.7513.26
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)7 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 5700 XT has 679% better value for money than TITAN V.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1200 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6304.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320160
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4.5 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm272 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan++
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.93
+6.8%
RX 5700 XT 38.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+6.8%
Samples: 152
RX 5700 XT 16028
Samples: 18401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+4%
125
1440p152
+100%
76
4K82
+74.5%
47

Cost per frame, $

1080p23.073.19
+86.2%
1440p19.735.25
+73.4%
4K36.578.49
+76.8%
  • RX 5700 XT has 86% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT has 73% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT has 77% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 175 175
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 133 133
Battlefield 5 119 119
Counter-Strike 2 308 308
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Far Cry 5 138 138
Fortnite 223 223
Forza Horizon 4 155 155
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 177 177
Valorant 313 313

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 78 78
Battlefield 5 110 110
Counter-Strike 2 177 177
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75
Dota 2 92 92
Far Cry 5 130 130
Far Cry 6 131 131
Fortnite 179 179
Forza Horizon 4 154 154
Grand Theft Auto V 145 145
Metro Exodus 97 97
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 166 166
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154 154
Valorant 294 294

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 105 105
Cyberpunk 2077 67 67
Dota 2 103 103
Far Cry 5 111 111
Forza Horizon 4 148 148
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139 139
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93 93
Valorant 159 159

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 143 143

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 105 105
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Far Cry 6 76 76
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 57 57
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 286 286

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89 89
Cyberpunk 2077 40 40
Far Cry 5 97 97
Forza Horizon 4 119 119
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93 93

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35 30−35
Counter-Strike 2 28 28
Far Cry 6 26 26
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 35 35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 54
Valorant 242 242

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60 60
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 17 17
Dota 2 93 93
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 79 79
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53 53

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45 45

This is how TITAN V and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 4% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 100% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 74% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.93 38.31
Recency 7 December 2017 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

TITAN V has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN V and Radeon RX 5700 XT.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3356 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10347 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.