Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs T400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T400 with Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.

T400
2021
2 GB GDDR6, 30 Watt
8.68
+42.3%

T400 outperforms Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
T400 T400
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking547643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.38no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe3 (2026)
GPU code nameTU117Wildcat Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (5 years ago)1 May 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed420 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.20no data
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+36.4%
22
−36.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
+0%
19
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how T400 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 36% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.68 6.10
Recency 6 May 2021 1 May 2026

T400 has a 42% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that T400 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T400 T400
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
T400 T400
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T1000 T1000
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T1000 T1000
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T400 T400
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
T600 T600
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
Pro W6800 Pro W6800
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
Arctic Sound 1T Arctic Sound 1T
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-2
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 413 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T400 or Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.