Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs T400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 T1000 8 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
B370 B390 G3 G3 Extreme Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Pro B370 Pro B390 Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T400 with Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.

T400
2021
2 GB GDDR6, 30 Watt
8.68

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms T400 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
T400 T400
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking550467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.39no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU117Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (5 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed420 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.20no data
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−47.6%
31
+47.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how T400 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 48% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.68 11.46
Recency 6 May 2021 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 32% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 in performance tests.

Be aware that T400 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T400 T400
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
T400 T400
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D V2 5090 D V2
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
Arc A770 A770
T1000 T1000
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile 4060 Mobile
T1000 T1000
vs
Radeon 840M 840M
T400 T400
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile 5060 Mobile
RX 6300 XT AMD RX 6300 XT
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
Arc Pro A40 A40
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19-Core GPU
Vega 7 AMD Vega 7
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2060 12 GB GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 419 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T400 or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.