Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.44

5700 XT outperforms M GL by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking518139
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.04
Power efficiency11.3113.26
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)7 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed931 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88304.8
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80160
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.44
RX 5700 XT 38.30
+306%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3950
Samples: 345
RX 5700 XT 16025
+306%
Samples: 18494

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−76%
125
1440p18−2076
+322%
4K10−1247
+370%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60 223
+291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 177
+421%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 270−280
+91.7%
Dota 2 65−70 92
+33.3%
Fortnite 55−60 179
+214%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 145
+314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 166
+388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 154
+516%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70 103
+49.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 139
+309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 93
+272%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 143
+151%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 79
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 54
+391%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40 93
+166%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 53
+489%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 45
+400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Resident Evil 4 Remake 145 145

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 119 119
Counter-Strike 2 308 308
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Far Cry 5 138 138
Forza Horizon 4 155 155
Valorant 313 313

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110 110
Counter-Strike 2 177 177
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75
Far Cry 5 130 130
Far Cry 6 131 131
Forza Horizon 4 154 154
Metro Exodus 97 97
Valorant 294 294

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 105 105
Cyberpunk 2077 67 67
Far Cry 5 111 111
Forza Horizon 4 148 148
Valorant 159 159

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 105 105
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Far Cry 6 76 76
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 57 57
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 286 286

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89 89
Cyberpunk 2077 40 40
Far Cry 5 97 97
Forza Horizon 4 119 119
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93 93

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28 28
Far Cry 6 26 26
Metro Exodus 35 35
Valorant 242 242

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60 60
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 17 17
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 79 79

This is how RX Vega M GL and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 317% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 322% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 370% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 516% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT performs better in 17 tests (28%)
  • there's a draw in 44 tests (72%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 38.30
Recency 1 February 2018 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 71% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 306% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10358 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.