Arc A770 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5 A550M 7 A730M 7 A770M 7 A780 A580 A750 A770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.45

A770 outperforms M GL by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking517200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.82
Power efficiency11.3411.06
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 22DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speed931 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88614.4
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs80256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.45
Arc A770 31.91
+238%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3961
Samples: 350
Arc A770 13378
+238%
Samples: 1861

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−70.6%
102
1440p16−1859
+269%
4K10−1237
+270%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.23
1440pno data5.58
4Kno data8.89

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60 140−150
+158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 130−140
+285%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 270−280
+91%
Dota 2 65−70 230−240
+233%
Fortnite 55−60 140−150
+158%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 105
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 130−140
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 196
+684%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70 230−240
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 130−140
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 72
+188%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 140−150
+158%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 48
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 73
+564%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40 110−120
+214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 40−45
+344%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 40−45
+344%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 317 317
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Hogwarts Legacy 125 125
Resident Evil 4 Remake 166 166

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Counter-Strike 2 270 270
Cyberpunk 2077 70 70
Far Cry 5 117 117
Forza Horizon 4 33 33
Hogwarts Legacy 92 92
Valorant 200−210 200−210

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Counter-Strike 2 143 143
Cyberpunk 2077 61 61
Far Cry 5 109 109
Forza Horizon 4 31 31
Hogwarts Legacy 74 74
Metro Exodus 113 113
Valorant 200−210 200−210

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 58 58
Far Cry 5 104 104
Forza Horizon 4 23 23
Hogwarts Legacy 62 62
Valorant 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90 90
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 220−230
Grand Theft Auto V 45 45
Metro Exodus 71 71
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 230−240 230−240

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45 45
Far Cry 5 82 82
Forza Horizon 4 15 15
Hogwarts Legacy 47 47
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60 60

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 80−85

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28 28
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 21−24
Metro Exodus 47 47
Valorant 190−200 190−200

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 50−55
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 26 26
Far Cry 5 49 49
Forza Horizon 4 8 8
Hogwarts Legacy 27 27

This is how RX Vega M GL and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 240% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 269% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 270% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 684% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770 performs better in 14 tests (23%)
  • there's a draw in 48 tests (77%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.45 31.91
Recency 1 February 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 71% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 238% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5600 XT
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 880M GTX 880M
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
FirePro D300 D300
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RX 5700 XT 5700 XT
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Steam Deck OLED GPU Steam Deck OLED GPU
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
N1 20SM N1 20SM
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 580G RX 580G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5533 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.