Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU102
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)4 September 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed931 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88419.0
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS13.41 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache320 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 4 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 208% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.