Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.45

RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms M GL by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2525.00
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304
Core clock speed931 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88175.0
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS5.599 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache320 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.45
RTX 3000 Max-Q 19.39
+105%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3936
Samples: 338
RTX 3000 Max-Q 8079
+105%
Samples: 166

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−111%
74
+111%
1440p21−24
−114%
45
+114%
4K14−16
−114%
30
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−80.7%
100−110
+80.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−62.5%
230−240
+62.5%
Dota 2 65−70
−82.6%
126
+82.6%
Fortnite 55−60
−80.7%
100−110
+80.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−143%
85
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−288%
97
+288%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−73.9%
120
+73.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−108%
52
+108%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−80.7%
100−110
+80.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−225%
65
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−209%
34
+209%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−117%
76
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX 3000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 111% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 114% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 288% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q performs better in 17 tests (26%)
  • there's a draw in 48 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.45 19.39
Recency 1 February 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has a 105% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 17% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Jetson Xavier NX GPU Jetson Xavier NX GPU
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 6500M RX 6500M
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
R9 M485X R9 M485X
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RX 560X 560X
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Tesla T40 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
7150 + nForce 630i 7150 + nForce 630i
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB 3080 12 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.