GeForce GTX 980M vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with GeForce GTX 980M, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
42.33
+140%

RX 9060 outperforms 980M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.9613.74
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 44GM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2025 (1 year ago)7 October 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921536
Core clock speed1700 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1127 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate334.951.84
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS1.659 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs11296
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1aNo outputs
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
BatteryBoost-+
Ansel-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9060 42.33
+140%
GTX 980M 17.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9060 17708
+140%
Samples: 113
GTX 980M 7386
Samples: 2900

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p400−450
+131%
173
Full HD170−18072
−57.6%
1440p85−90
+136%
36
4K65−70
+132%
28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 35−40
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45 40−45

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 82 82
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 35−40
Far Cry 5 58 58
Fortnite 178 178
Forza Horizon 4 74 74
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85 85
Valorant 130−140 130−140

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 68 68
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230 230
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 35−40
Dota 2 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 53 53
Far Cry 6 50−55 50−55
Fortnite 86 86
Forza Horizon 4 68 68
Grand Theft Auto V 60 60
Metro Exodus 31 31
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79 79
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61 61
Valorant 130−140 130−140

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 61 61
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 35−40
Dota 2 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 5 50 50
Forza Horizon 4 47 47
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49 49
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33 33
Valorant 130−140 130−140

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 63 63

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140 130−140
Far Cry 6 27−30 27−30
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 30−33
Metro Exodus 19 19
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
Valorant 150−160 150−160

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45 45
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 16−18
Far Cry 5 34 34
Forza Horizon 4 39 39
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 27−30

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40 40

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 16−18
Far Cry 6 9−10 9−10
Grand Theft Auto V 41 41
Metro Exodus 12 12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 22
Valorant 90−95 90−95

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 23 23
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 7−8
Dota 2 60−65 60−65
Far Cry 5 16 16
Forza Horizon 4 26 26
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17 17

4K
Epic

Fortnite 19 19

This is how RX 9060 and GTX 980M compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 131% faster in 900p
  • RX 9060 is 136% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 is 136% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 is 132% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.33 17.65
Recency 5 August 2025 7 October 2014
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm

RX 9060 has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 86% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 86 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 402 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or GeForce GTX 980M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.