Radeon PRO W7400 vs RX 7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency51.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2025 (1 year ago)3 August 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921792
Core clock speed1452 MHz330 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million13.3 billion
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate257.6123.2
Floating-point processing power16.49 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6464
TMUs112112
Ray Tracing Cores2828
L0 Cache448 KB448 KB
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache64 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s172.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.14x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 55 Watt

RX 7400 has 22% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7400 and Radeon PRO W7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7400 or Radeon PRO W7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.