Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs RX 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 5600M 6500M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8040S 8050S 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9050 9050 4 GB 9050 8 GB 9050 OEM 9060 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT LP

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8050S with Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, including specs and performance data.

RX 8050S
2025
35.49

9060 XT LP outperforms 8050S by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 8050S RX 8050S
RX 9060 XT LP RX 9060 XT LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking163100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.12
Architectureno dataRDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)17 December 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speedno data1380 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHz3050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data390.4
Floating-point processing powerno data24.99 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
−14.5%
110−120

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 240−250
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 100−105
+20.5%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100 110−120
+15.8%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130 150−160
+19%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 240−250
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry 5 100 120−130
+20%
Fortnite 150−160 190−200
+20.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 170−180
+22.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 170−180
+18.9%
Valorant 210−220 260−270
+18.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 100−110 130−140
+21.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130 150−160
+19%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 240−250
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry 5 96 110−120
+14.6%
Fortnite 150−160 190−200
+20.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 170−180
+22.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 118 140−150
+18.6%
Metro Exodus 85−90 100−105
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 170−180
+18.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156 190−200
+21.8%
Valorant 210−220 260−270
+18.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 150−160
+19%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry 5 85 100−105
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 170−180
+22.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 170−180
+18.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 110−120
+19.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 190−200
+20.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 100−105
+12.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 300−310
+19%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 90−95
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 50−55 60−65
+15.4%
Valorant 250−260 300−310
+19%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 110−120
+17%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 50−55
+22%
Far Cry 5 85−90 100−105
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105 120−130
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 80−85
+19.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95 110−120
+17%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 50−55
+22%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 90−95
+16.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35 35−40
+9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 65−70
+14%
Valorant 210−220 260−270
+18.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 65−70
+14%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 21−24
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50 55−60
+17%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 80−85
+19.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 55−60
+19.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 55−60
+19.6%

This is how RX 8050S and RX 9060 XT LP compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT LP is 17% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 35.49 43.47
Recency 6 January 2025 17 December 2025

RX 9060 XT LP has a 22% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8050S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RX 9060 XT LP Radeon RX 9060 XT LP
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
vs
Voodoo Banshee AGP 16 MB
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
vs
RTX 5060 GB205 RTX 5060 GB205
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 SD X2 Adreno X2-45
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
HD 8210 Radeon HD 8210
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
HD 6610M Radeon HD 6610M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8050S or Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.