Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3060 Ti
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
48.42
+11.4%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms 9060 XT LP by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75100
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.56no data
Power efficiency18.8124.12
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2020 (5 years ago)17 December 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48642048
Core clock speed1410 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz3050 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate253.1390.4
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPS24.99 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs152128
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores3832
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache4.8 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3060 Ti 48.42
+11.4%
RX 9060 XT LP 43.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Ti 20215
+11.4%
Samples: 34826
RX 9060 XT LP 18147
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD135
+12.5%
120−130
1440p74
+13.8%
65−70
4K48
+20%
40−45

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p5.39no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 236
+12.4%
210−220
Counter-Strike 2 344
+14.7%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+20%
110−120
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172
+14.7%
150−160

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 180
+12.5%
160−170
Battlefield 5 145
+11.5%
130−140
Counter-Strike 2 330
+13.8%
290−300
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+13%
100−105
Far Cry 5 144
+20%
120−130
Fortnite 210−220
+16.7%
180−190
Forza Horizon 4 200
+17.6%
170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+14.7%
150−160
Valorant 280−290
+12%
250−260

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 103
+14.4%
90−95
Battlefield 5 124
+12.7%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 224
+12%
200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+15.8%
240−250
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+11.8%
85−90
Dota 2 145
+11.5%
130−140
Far Cry 5 137
+14.2%
120−130
Fortnite 210−220
+16.7%
180−190
Forza Horizon 4 196
+15.3%
170−180
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+17.5%
120−130
Metro Exodus 110
+15.8%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+14.7%
150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+15.6%
160−170
Valorant 280−290
+12%
250−260

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 114
+14%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+12%
75−80
Dota 2 135
+12.5%
120−130
Far Cry 5 129
+17.3%
110−120
Forza Horizon 4 173
+15.3%
150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+14.7%
150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+15%
80−85
Valorant 274
+14.2%
240−250

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+16.7%
180−190

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 146
+12.3%
130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+17.3%
300−310
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+14.1%
85−90
Metro Exodus 66
+20%
55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
Valorant 300−350
+14.3%
280−290

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+15.3%
85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+20%
45−50
Far Cry 5 105
+16.7%
90−95
Forza Horizon 4 150
+15.4%
130−140
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+15.6%
90−95

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+11.7%
120−130

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 36
+20%
30−33
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+12.6%
95−100
Metro Exodus 43
+22.9%
35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+18.5%
65−70
Valorant 290−300
+12.3%
260−270

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65
+18.2%
55−60
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+22%
50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+19%
21−24
Dota 2 109
+14.7%
95−100
Far Cry 5 65
+18.2%
55−60
Forza Horizon 4 103
+14.4%
90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+11.4%
70−75

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+16.7%
60−65

This is how RTX 3060 Ti and RX 9060 XT LP compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 13% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 14% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.42 43.47
Recency 1 December 2020 17 December 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 140 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has a 11% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 9060 XT LP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19670 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3060 Ti or Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.