RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800
2020, $579
16 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
52.73
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023
24 GB GDDR6, 210 Watt
67.02
+27.1%

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms RX 6800 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.84no data
Power efficiency16.4324.86
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD103
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)9 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38407680
Core clock speed1700 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2619.2
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs240240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Cores6060
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm245 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 52.73
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 67.02
+27.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 22061
Samples: 5017
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 28041
+27.1%
Samples: 174

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD175220−230
+25.7%
1440p102120−130
+17.6%
4K6275−80
+21%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.31no data
1440p5.68no data
4K9.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 350 400−450
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 135 170−180
+25.9%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 322 400−450
+24.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160 200−210
+26.6%
Counter-Strike 2 349 400−450
+14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 115 140−150
+21.7%
Far Cry 5 197 250−260
+26.9%
Fortnite 230−240 290−300
+23.9%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 260−270
+26.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+15.1%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160 200−210
+26.6%
Counter-Strike 2 259 300−310
+15.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 350−400
+25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 104 130−140
+25%
Dota 2 145 180−190
+24.1%
Far Cry 5 186 230−240
+23.7%
Far Cry 6 161 200−210
+24.2%
Fortnite 230−240 290−300
+23.9%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 260−270
+26.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 159 200−210
+25.8%
Metro Exodus 147 180−190
+22.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 269 300−310
+11.5%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+15.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160 200−210
+26.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 99 120−130
+21.2%
Dota 2 128 160−170
+25%
Far Cry 5 174 220−230
+26.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 260−270
+26.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152 190−200
+25%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+15.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240 290−300
+23.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175 220−230
+25.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 450−500
+15.1%
Far Cry 6 115 140−150
+21.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 125 150−160
+20%
Metro Exodus 89 110−120
+23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 220−230
+25.7%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 160−170
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 74 90−95
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 163 200−210
+22.7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 210−220
+25.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 140−150
+18.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 180−190
+21.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 47 55−60
+17%
Far Cry 6 69 85−90
+23.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 132 160−170
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 55 65−70
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99 120−130
+21.2%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+14%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 110−120
+22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 85−90
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 34 40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 102 120−130
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 91 110−120
+20.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 150−160
+26.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 110−120
+19.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 95−100
+21.8%

This is how RX 6800 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 26% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 18% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.73 67.02
Recency 28 October 2020 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 210 Watt

RTX 4500 Ada Generation has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2455 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.