RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5800 5800 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
L4 2000 Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 4000 Ada Generation 4000 SFF Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation 6000D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600 XT
2021, $379
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.47
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
49.46
+25.3%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms 6600 XT by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13171
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.77no data
Power efficiency19.1254.77
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 July 2021 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed1968 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4299.5
Floating-point processing power10.6 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores3248
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB6 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600 XT 39.47
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 49.46
+25.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 XT 16444
Samples: 7123
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20604
+25.3%
Samples: 245

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124150−160
+21%
1440p6885−90
+25%
4K4050−55
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
1440p5.57no data
4K9.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 120−130 150−160
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 270−280
+23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 79 95−100
+20.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 100−110 130−140
+20.4%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 120−130 150−160
+25%
Battlefield 5 130−140 160−170
+18.5%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 270−280
+23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 78 95−100
+21.8%
Far Cry 5 151 180−190
+19.2%
Fortnite 170−180 210−220
+22.1%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 190−200
+24.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 190−200
+21.8%
Valorant 230−240 290−300
+22.9%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 120−130 150−160
+25%
Battlefield 5 130−140 160−170
+18.5%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 270−280
+23.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 76 95−100
+25%
Dota 2 170 210−220
+23.5%
Far Cry 5 141 170−180
+20.6%
Fortnite 170−180 210−220
+22.1%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 190−200
+24.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 135 160−170
+18.5%
Metro Exodus 95 110−120
+15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 190−200
+21.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 176 220−230
+25%
Valorant 230−240 290−300
+22.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 160−170
+18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 69 85−90
+23.2%
Dota 2 120 150−160
+25%
Far Cry 5 133 160−170
+20.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 190−200
+24.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 190−200
+21.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99 120−130
+21.2%
Valorant 230−240 290−300
+22.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 210−220
+22.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 120−130
+17.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 350−400
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 68 85−90
+25%
Metro Exodus 56 70−75
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+20%
Valorant 270−280 300−310
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 120−130
+18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40 50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 105 130−140
+23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 140−150
+22.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 95−100
+23.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 130−140
+22.6%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35 40−45
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 55−60
+17%
Grand Theft Auto V 64 80−85
+25%
Metro Exodus 34 40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 65−70
+20.4%
Valorant 240−250 300−310
+23%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 80−85
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 55−60
+17%
Cyberpunk 2077 14 16−18
+14.3%
Dota 2 86 100−105
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 51 60−65
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 95−100
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 65−70
+18.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 65−70
+22.6%

This is how RX 6600 XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 21% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.47 49.46
Recency 30 July 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 56% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
vs
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
RTX 5090 DD 5090 DD
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 3070 Ti
GeForce 6800 6800
vs
RTX 3060 Ti RTX 3060 Ti
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
vs
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
GTX 460 X2 GTX 460 X2
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RX 6800M RX 6800M
RTX 2060 12 GB RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX 2060 12 GB RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
T600 T600
Arc B570 Arc B570
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 5652 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 60 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 XT or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.