RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5800 5800 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 4000 Ada Generation 4000 SFF Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation 6000D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600 XT
2021, $379
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.31
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024, $649
16 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
40.48
+3%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms 6600 XT by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131118
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.4736.92
Power efficiency19.1244.98
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 July 2021 (5 years ago)12 February 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6600 XT has 31% better value for money than RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482816
Core clock speed1968 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4187.4
Floating-point processing power10.6 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12888
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores3222
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB2.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length190 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600 XT 39.31
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 40.48
+3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 XT 16447
Samples: 7169
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 16935
+3%
Samples: 1093

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+3.3%
120−130
1440p6870−75
+2.9%
4K4040−45
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06
+43.5%
5.41
1440p5.57
+39.9%
9.27
4K9.48
+41.6%
16.23
  • RX 6600 XT has 43% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT has 40% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT has 42% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220 220−230
+0.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 79 80−85
+1.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 100−110 110−120
+1.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 220−230
+0.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78 80−85
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 151
+0.7%
150−160
Fortnite 170−180
+1.2%
170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2%
150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+2.6%
Valorant 230−240 240−250
+1.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
Counter-Strike 2 210−220 220−230
+0.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+1.3%
75−80
Dota 2 170 170−180
Far Cry 5 141
+0.7%
140−150
Far Cry 6 110 110−120
Fortnite 170−180
+1.2%
170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2%
150−160
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+3.8%
130−140
Metro Exodus 95 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 176 180−190
+2.3%
Valorant 230−240 240−250
+1.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 69 70−75
+1.4%
Dota 2 120 120−130
Far Cry 5 133
+2.3%
130−140
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2%
150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99 100−105
+1%
Valorant 230−240 240−250
+1.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+1.2%
170−180

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+2%
100−105
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 280−290
Far Cry 6 73 75−80
+2.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 68 70−75
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 56
+1.8%
55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 270−280 270−280

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+1%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 40 40−45
Far Cry 5 105
+5%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+2.7%
75−80

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+6%
100−105

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
Far Cry 6 21 21−24
Grand Theft Auto V 64 65−70
+1.6%
Metro Exodus 34 35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 55−60
+1.9%
Valorant 240−250 250−260
+2.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 65−70
+1.6%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 14 14−16
Dota 2 86
+1.2%
85−90
Far Cry 5 51
+2%
50−55
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+6%
50−55

This is how RX 6600 XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 3% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.31 40.48
Recency 30 July 2021 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 56% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6600 XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX A4000H RTX A4000H
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
vs
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R4 (Beema) (Beema)
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU 16EU
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) Intel Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile 5070 Mobile
GT 1010 NVIDIA GT 1010
vs
AI PRO R9700 R9700
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA SXM4 40 GB
vs
H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
Arc A770M A770M
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6800M 6800M
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Max-Q
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Steam Machine GPU Machine GPU
RX 6800M AMD RX 6800M
vs
RTX A2000 A2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 5653 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 100 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 XT or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.