Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Radeon R9 M385X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6961610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameStratoNV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)31 May 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate61.601.000
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs564
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M385X 1993
+99550%
Samples: 9
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Palworld 12−14 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Palworld 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
Palworld 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data
Palworld 12−14 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data
Palworld 6−7 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Palworld 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data
Palworld 0−1 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 M385X has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M385X and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M385X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M385X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M385X or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.