Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Radeon R9 M370X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7741610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCape VerdeNV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date19 May 2015 (11 years ago)31 May 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)8.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M370X 1570
+78400%
Samples: 423
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Palworld 10−11 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Fortnite 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Palworld 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 103 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Fortnite 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Palworld 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data
Palworld 10−11 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data
Palworld 5−6 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 May 2015 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 M370X has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M370X and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M370X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M370X or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.