GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 FURY X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 FURY X and GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R9 FURY X outperforms 570 Rev. 2 by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 285 | 622 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.87 | 0.93 |
| Power efficiency | 6.33 | 2.32 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Fiji | GF110 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 24 June 2015 (11 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $349 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
R9 FURY X has 531% better value for money than GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 480 |
| Compute units | 64 | no data |
| Core clock speed | no data | 732 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,900 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 268.8 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.602 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 40 |
| TMUs | 256 | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 640 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 195 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | + | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 152.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DisplayPort support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| CrossFire | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| LiquidVR | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TressFX | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
| DDMA audio | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.49 | 6.57 |
| Recency | 24 June 2015 | 7 December 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 219 Watt |
R9 FURY X has a 242% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
GTX 570 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 26% lower power consumption.
The Radeon R9 FURY X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
