GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data0.45
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameWaniG71
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2017 (8 years ago)5 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed200 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,200 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6012.00 ×2
ROPs816 ×2
TMUs2424 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data270 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 5 June 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 11 years, a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 633% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and GeForce 7950 GX2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or GeForce 7950 GX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.