HD Graphics 500 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.28
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameWaniApollo Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 September 2017 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed200 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate21.607.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 2 years.

HD Graphics 500, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and HD Graphics 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 500 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 794 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or HD Graphics 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.