RTX A2000 Embedded vs Radeon Pro W6600M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX A2000 Embedded, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro W6600M outperforms RTX A2000 Embedded by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 231 | 249 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 24.79 | 59.37 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Navi 23 | GA107S |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 June 2021 (5 years ago) | 30 March 2022 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1224 MHz | 607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2034 MHz | 1177 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,060 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 227.8 | 94.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.29 TFLOPS | 6.026 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 20 |
| L0 Cache | 448 KB | no data |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+9.3%
|
150−160 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+14.5%
|
55−60 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 70−75
+12.3%
|
65−70 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+10%
|
100−105 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+9.3%
|
150−160 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+11.8%
|
85−90 |
| Fortnite | 130−140
+13.3%
|
120−130 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+14%
|
100−105 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+14.5%
|
55−60 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+17%
|
100−105 |
| Valorant | 180−190
+11.2%
|
170−180 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+10%
|
100−105 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+9.3%
|
150−160 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+9.2%
|
250−260 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65 |
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+10.8%
|
120−130 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+11.8%
|
85−90 |
| Fortnite | 130−140
+13.3%
|
120−130 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+14%
|
100−105 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 100−110
+8.4%
|
95−100 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+14.5%
|
55−60 |
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+17%
|
100−105 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
+9.4%
|
85−90 |
| Valorant | 180−190
+11.2%
|
170−180 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+10%
|
100−105 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65 |
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+10.8%
|
120−130 |
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+11.8%
|
85−90 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+14%
|
100−105 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+14.5%
|
55−60 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+17%
|
100−105 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
+9.4%
|
85−90 |
| Valorant | 180−190
+11.2%
|
170−180 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 130−140
+13.3%
|
120−130 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 200−210
+7.9%
|
190−200 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+12%
|
50−55 |
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+17.1%
|
35−40 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+9.4%
|
160−170 |
| Valorant | 220−230
+10%
|
200−210 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+12.9%
|
70−75 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+15%
|
60−65 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+11.4%
|
70−75 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75
+12.3%
|
65−70 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+16%
|
50−55 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18 |
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+10%
|
40−45 |
| Valorant | 170−180
+14%
|
150−160 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+15%
|
40−45 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14 |
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+13.8%
|
80−85 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+15.6%
|
45−50 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+13.3%
|
30−33 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+13.3%
|
30−33 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.62 | 26.66 |
| Recency | 8 June 2021 | 30 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pro W6600M has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.
RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 61% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX A2000 Embedded.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
