GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019, $799
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
33.92
+7117%

Pro W5700 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 7117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1741329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.76no data
Power efficiency12.830.73
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 10G96C
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)27 August 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1400 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1880 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate270.74.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448
L2 Cache4 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.84.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W5700 33.92
+7117%
9400 GT 0.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5700 14133
+7185%
Samples: 417
9400 GT 194
Samples: 1427

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.92 0.47
Recency 19 November 2019 27 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 7117% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87% more advanced lithography process.

9400 GT, on the other hand, has 76% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 124 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 536 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.