GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon Pro 5700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5700 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.
Pro 5700 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 5751% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 237 | 1324 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 16.36 | 0.73 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | G96C |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (6 years ago) | 27 August 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79.99 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 | 4.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.221 TFLOPS | 0.0448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 144 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.50 | 0.47 |
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | 27 August 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
Pro 5700 has a 5751% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.
9400 GT, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
