Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Radeon Pro VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.10no data
Power efficiency10.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameVega 20Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 May 2020 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0144.0
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs24064
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Pro VII has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 793% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2149 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 249 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro VII or Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.