GeForce GT 325M vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.38
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA100GT216
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (6 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691248
Core clock speed1410 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate609.17.200
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.09504 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data142
ROPs1608
TMUs43216
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EDDR3
Maximum RAM amount40 GB1 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0+
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 23 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

GT 325M, on the other hand, has 1639% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GeForce GT 325M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 325M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 325M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or GeForce GT 325M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.