Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU vs Radeon PRO W7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.40no data
Power efficiency19.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)no data
GPU code nameNavi 31no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (3 years ago)3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448040
Core clock speed1895 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2525 MHzno data
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate707.0no data
Floating-point processing power45.25 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs280no data
Ray Tracing Cores70no data
L0 Cache2.2 MBno data
L1 Cache2 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2023 3 March 2026
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 75 Watt

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, and 247% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7800 and M5 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 633 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7800 or M5 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.