Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU vs Radeon PRO W7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.50no data
Power efficiency22.35no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)no data
GPU code nameNavi 32no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2023 (2 years ago)3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307240
Core clock speed1900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2600 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate499.2no data
Floating-point processing power31.95 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L0 Cache768 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2023 3 March 2026
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 75 Watt

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, and 153% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7700 and M5 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 633 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7700 or M5 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.