GeForce 9100M G vs Radeon HD 8210

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce 9100M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8210
2014
8 Watt
0.47
+135%

HD 8210 outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13221471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.54no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)no data
GPU code nameKalindiMCP77MH MCP79MH
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 January 2014 (12 years ago)3 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1288
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8210 0.47
+135%
9100M G 0.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8210 197
+137%
Samples: 614
9100M G 83
Samples: 83

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5
+150%
2−3
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD 8210 and 9100M G compete in popular games:

  • HD 8210 is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8210 is 150% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 9100M G is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8210 performs better in 14 tests (56%)
  • 9100M G performs better in 2 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.20
Recency 31 January 2014 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

HD 8210 has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8210 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or GeForce 9100M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.