Arc Pro B65 vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.54no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameKalindiBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 January 2014 (12 years ago)April 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed300 MHz2400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400384.0
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data10 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 200 Watt

HD 8210 has 2400% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B65, on the other hand, has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and Arc Pro B65. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B65 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Arc Pro B65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or Arc Pro B65, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.