GeForce 9800 GX2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4770 and GeForce 9800 GX2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4770
2009, $109
512 MB GDDR5, 80 Watt
2.18
+48.3%

HD 4770 outperforms 9800 GX2 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9271043
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.330.03
Power efficiency2.110.58
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV740G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2009 (17 years ago)18 March 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

ATI HD 4770 has 1000% better value for money than 9800 GX2.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640256 (128 per GPU) ×2
Core clock speed750 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors826 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt197 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate24.0038.40 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1616 ×2
TMUs3264 ×2
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length203 mm267 mm
Heightno data2-slot
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s128 (64 per GPU) ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoHDMIDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4770 2.18
+48.3%
9800 GX2 1.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4770 908
+48.4%
Samples: 417
9800 GX2 612
Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 1.47
Recency 28 April 2009 18 March 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 197 Watt

ATI HD 4770 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 146% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GX2 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 77 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or GeForce 9800 GX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.