Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ATI HD 5970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5970 and Radeon RX 6800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5970
2009, $699
1 GB GDDR5, 294 Watt
5.47
RX 6800 XT
2020, $649
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
60.03
+997%

6800 XT outperforms HD 5970 by a whopping 997% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3239.48
Power efficiency1.4515.58
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameHemlockNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 November 2009 (16 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 12238% better value for money than ATI HD 5970.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600 ×24608
Core clock speed725 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)294 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00 ×2648.0
Floating-point processing power2.32 TFLOPS ×220.74 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×2128
TMUs80 ×2288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cache320 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×216 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s ×2512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5970 5.47
RX 6800 XT 60.03
+997%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5970 2290
Samples: 536
RX 6800 XT 25113
+997%
Samples: 8076

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

ATI HD 5970 3690
RX 6800 XT 49735
+1248%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18195
+1119%
1440p12−14138
+1050%
4K8−992
+1050%

Cost per frame, $

1080p43.693.33
+92.4%
1440p58.254.70
+91.9%
4K87.387.05
+91.9%
  • RX 6800 XT has 92% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 92% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 92% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300 290−300
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Resident Evil 4 Remake 180−190 180−190

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191 191
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 290−300
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Far Cry 5 143 143
Fortnite 280−290 280−290
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 230−240
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183 183
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 290−300
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Dota 2 166 166
Far Cry 5 139 139
Far Cry 6 160−170 160−170
Fortnite 280−290 280−290
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 230−240
Grand Theft Auto V 150 150
Metro Exodus 152 152
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294 294
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175 175
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Dota 2 145 145
Far Cry 5 130 130
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 230−240
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160 160
Valorant 356 356

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290 280−290

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 450−500
Far Cry 6 120−130 120−130
Grand Theft Auto V 120 120
Metro Exodus 95 95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 400−450 400−450

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154 154
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 131 131
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 200−210
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 140−150

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 6 70−75 70−75
Grand Theft Auto V 134 134
Metro Exodus 56 56
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110 110
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103 103
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Dota 2 122 122
Far Cry 5 95 95
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how ATI HD 5970 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 1119% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 1050% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 1050% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.47 60.03
Recency 18 November 2009 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 294 Watt 300 Watt

ATI HD 5970 has 2% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 997% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 83% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5970 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 56 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4704 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5970 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.