GRID K240Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.60
Power efficiencyno data2.10
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV635GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 November 2011 (14 years ago)28 June 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201536
Core clock speed796 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors378 million3.54 billion
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate6.36895.36
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs8128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed693 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.18 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 November 2011 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

ATI HD 4580 has 246% lower power consumption.

GRID K240Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4580 and GRID K240Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4580 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K240Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4580 or GRID K240Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.