ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand vs GRID K240Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking644not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.60no data
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104RV635
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (13 years ago)22 November 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536120
Core clock speed745 MHz796 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate95.366.368
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS0.191 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data190 mm
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s12.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 22 November 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

GRID K240Q has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand, on the other hand, has 246% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K240Q and Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K240Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K240Q or Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.