CMP 30HX vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiencyno data9.05
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRenoirTU116
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201408
Core clock speed400 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00157.1
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2088
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Graphics 320SP has a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 733% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.