Radeon Vega 7 vs CMP 30HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 RTX 8000 T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 Tesla T4 Tesla T10 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 30HX with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

CMP 30HX
2021, $799
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
14.62
+117%

CMP 30HX outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
Vega 7 Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking404613
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.82no data
Power efficiency9.0511.57
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2021 (5 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408448
Core clock speed1530 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate157.153.20
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs8828
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+105%
22
−105%
1440p60−65
+114%
28
−114%
4K35−40
+94.4%
18
−94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p17.76no data
1440p13.32no data
4K22.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14
+0%
14
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how CMP 30HX and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • CMP 30HX is 105% faster in 1080p
  • CMP 30HX is 114% faster in 1440p
  • CMP 30HX is 94% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.62 6.73
Recency 25 February 2021 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

CMP 30HX has a 117% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 178% lower power consumption.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that CMP 30HX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
H100 PCIe H100 PCIe
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
9500 GT Rev. 3 GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
Arc Pro B65 Arc Pro B65
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
ROG Ally GPU ROG Ally GPU
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
vs
E8870 MXM Radeon E8870 MXM
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
vs
Arc A770M Arc A770M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3468 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 30HX or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.