Radeon RX 9050 vs RTX A4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with Radeon RX 9050, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
34.64
+42%

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms RX 9050 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.4620.66
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 44
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (5 years ago)28 July 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1140 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8166.4
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8064
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4016
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4000 Mobile 34.64
+42%
RX 9050 24.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 Mobile 14494
+42%
Samples: 666
RX 9050 10208
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+50.8%
130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+47.3%
55−60

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+50.8%
130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
Far Cry 5 110−120
+42.5%
80−85
Fortnite 150−160
+56%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+48.4%
95−100
Valorant 210−220
+43.3%
150−160

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+50.8%
130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+46.3%
190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
Dota 2 140−150
+48.4%
95−100
Far Cry 5 110−120
+42.5%
80−85
Far Cry 6 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
Fortnite 150−160
+56%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+50%
80−85
Metro Exodus 80−85
+50.9%
55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+48.4%
95−100
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+42.4%
85−90
Valorant 210−220
+43.3%
150−160

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
Dota 2 140−150
+48.4%
95−100
Far Cry 5 110−120
+42.5%
80−85
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+48.4%
95−100
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+42.4%
85−90
Valorant 210−220
+43.3%
150−160

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+56%
100−105

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+43.3%
60−65
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+44.7%
170−180
Far Cry 6 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+44%
50−55
Metro Exodus 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
Valorant 240−250
+45.9%
170−180

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+53.3%
60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
Far Cry 5 85−90
+54.5%
55−60
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+44.4%
45−50

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+53.3%
60−65

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
Far Cry 6 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+48%
50−55
Metro Exodus 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
Valorant 210−220
+42.7%
150−160

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+60%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
Dota 2 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
Far Cry 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+50%
30−33

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+46.7%
30−33

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.64 24.40
Recency 12 April 2021 28 July 2026
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 92 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 42% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 9050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9050 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9050 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 39 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 Mobile or Radeon RX 9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.