Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs RTX A2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A1000 A2000 A2000 12 GB A4000 A4000H A4500 A5000 A5000-8Q A5000-12Q A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7400 PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900 PRO W7900 Dual Slot PRO W7900D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000
2021, $449
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
31.96
+2.5%
PRO W7800 48 GB
2024, $2,499
48 GB GDDR6, 281 Watt
31.17

RTX A2000 outperforms PRO W7800 48 GB by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7800 48 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.676.30
Power efficiency35.618.65
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (5 years ago)15 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX A2000 has 355% better value for money than PRO W7800 48 GB.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33284480
Core clock speed562 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8707.0
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48128
TMUs104280
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores2670
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache3.3 MB2 MB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length167 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A2000 31.96
+2.5%
PRO W7800 48 GB 31.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 13397
+2.5%
Samples: 1168
PRO W7800 48 GB 13068
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+5.9%
85−90
1440p43
+7.5%
40−45
4K27
+12.5%
24−27

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.99
+83%
29.40
1440p10.44
+83.3%
62.48
4K16.63
+84%
104.13
  • RTX A2000 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 has 84% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+7.1%
170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
Resident Evil 4 Remake 80−85
+3.8%
80−85

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+7.1%
170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
Far Cry 5 108
+8%
100−105
Fortnite 140−150
+5%
140−150
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
Valorant 200−210
+7.4%
190−200

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+7.1%
170−180
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2.6%
270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
Far Cry 5 98
+3.2%
95−100
Fortnite 140−150
+5%
140−150
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+7.5%
120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
Metro Exodus 60
+9.1%
55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+6.4%
110−120
Valorant 200−210
+7.4%
190−200

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
Far Cry 5 91
+7.1%
85−90
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+9.2%
120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+6.7%
60−65
Valorant 200−210
+7.4%
190−200

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+5%
140−150

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+2.7%
75−80
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+3.6%
220−230
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+5.5%
55−60
Metro Exodus 34
+13.3%
30−33
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Valorant 230−240
+2.6%
230−240

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+8.8%
80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
Far Cry 5 61
+10.9%
55−60
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+4.4%
45−50

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+5%
80−85

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+12%
50−55
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
Metro Exodus 20
+11.1%
18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+14.3%
35−40
Valorant 190−200
+3.2%
190−200

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
Far Cry 5 30
+11.1%
27−30
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+14.3%
35−40

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+14.3%
35−40

This is how RTX A2000 and PRO W7800 48 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.96 31.17
Recency 10 August 2021 15 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 281 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX A2000 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
L20 L20
PRO W7800 48 GB Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
vs
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
GTX 1080 GTX 1080
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 2060 2060
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 3070 3070
R5 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
vs
RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU
HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5500
vs
RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU
HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 505
vs
RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5570 HD 5570
9600 GT Green Edition GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition
vs
HD 6450 HD 6450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 634 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.