Radeon PRO W7900D vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.84no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)28 November 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61446144
Core clock speed720 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2156 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate299.5827.9
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64192
TMUs192384
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4896
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cache6 MB3 MB
L2 Cache48 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm280 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB48 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 28 November 2025
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 76% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7900D. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 60 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7900D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation or Radeon PRO W7900D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.