Rubin Ultra GPU vs Quadro T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.21no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameTU117GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (7 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data57344
Core clock speed1395 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4,062.5
Floating-point processing powerno data260 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data1792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM4e
Maximum RAM amountno data1024 GB
Memory bus widthno data32768 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 3600 Watt

Quadro T1000 has 7100% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T1000 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 560 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.