Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016, $2,499
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.51
+79.8%

P5000 outperforms Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.81no data
Power efficiency13.13no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe3 (2026)
GPU code nameGP104Wildcat Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 May 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed1607 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate277.3no data
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1127 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+76.3%
22
−76.3%
4K41
+80.5%
8−9
−80.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 85−90
+83.1%
14−16
−83.1%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+82.8%
30−33
−82.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+81.4%
12−14
−81.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75−80
+87.2%
10−11
−87.2%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 85−90
+83.1%
14−16
−83.1%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+76.5%
27−30
−76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+82.8%
30−33
−82.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+81.4%
12−14
−81.4%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+81.2%
18−20
−81.2%
Fortnite 140−150
+73.2%
35−40
−73.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+76.9%
27−30
−76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+81.5%
21−24
−81.5%
Valorant 190−200
+64.8%
65−70
−64.8%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 85−90
+83.1%
14−16
−83.1%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+76.5%
27−30
−76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+82.8%
30−33
−82.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+62.9%
100−110
−62.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+81.4%
12−14
−81.4%
Dota 2 130−140
+80%
27−30
−80%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+81.2%
18−20
−81.2%
Fortnite 140−150
+73.2%
35−40
−73.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+76.9%
27−30
−76.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+84.3%
17
−84.3%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+83.1%
12−14
−83.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+81.5%
21−24
−81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+82.7%
16−18
−82.7%
Valorant 190−200
+64.8%
65−70
−64.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+76.5%
27−30
−76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+81.4%
12−14
−81.4%
Dota 2 130−140
+80%
27−30
−80%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+81.2%
18−20
−81.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+76.9%
27−30
−76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+81.5%
21−24
−81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+67.9%
16−18
−67.9%
Valorant 190−200
+82.1%
35−40
−82.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+73.2%
35−40
−73.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+84.7%
10−12
−84.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+77.9%
45−50
−77.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+90.2%
6−7
−90.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+88.4%
5−6
−88.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+80%
35−40
−80%
Valorant 220−230
+72.4%
60−65
−72.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+88%
10−11
−88%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+87.9%
4−5
−87.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+83.6%
12−14
−83.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+83.1%
14−16
−83.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+85.2%
8−9
−85.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+82.4%
6−7
−82.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+72.6%
16−18
−72.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+96.3%
1−2
−96.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+88.9%
4−5
−88.9%
Valorant 180−190
+85.9%
24−27
−85.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+89.8%
5−6
−89.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+82.4%
6−7
−82.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+93.3%
1−2
−93.3%
Dota 2 95−100
+81.1%
18−20
−81.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+86.8%
5−6
−86.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+83.9%
9−10
−83.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+83.8%
6−7
−83.8%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+83.8%
6−7
−83.8%

This is how Quadro P5000 and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 76% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 96% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.51 6.15
Recency 1 October 2016 1 May 2026

Quadro P5000 has a 80% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 5070 Ti Mobile
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
FirePro M6100 M6100
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
R9 290X 290X
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
NVS 510 510
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Quadro 7000 7000
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Plex 7000 7000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 201 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.