Arc G3 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.80no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGP104Panther Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed1139 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate157.296.00
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs11240
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cache672 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 16 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

Arc G3 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 433% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc G3 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.