RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4 Mobile A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.10

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.8118.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1139 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2135.0
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs11280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache672 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3200 Max-Q 22.10
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.59
+2.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q 9205
Samples: 159
RTX A2000 Mobile 9409
+2.2%
Samples: 2187

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−5.3%
79
+5.3%
1440p40−45
−5%
42
+5%
4K35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+0%
96
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 9% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.10 22.59
Recency 21 February 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 27% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P3200 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
vs
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 617
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
R5 M330 Radeon R5 M330
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 2080 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 144 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.