Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameGP107GLGMA 500
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 July 2017 (9 years ago)1 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684
Core clock speed1215 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6008 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 July 2017 1 November 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

P2000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 Max-Q or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.